Skip to main content

Health care reform: an EMOTIONAL issue

This popped up on my Facebook page: an exchange between Rep. Anthony Weiner of New York, and Joe Scarborough on Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2009's "Morning Joe." You can read about it, and see it, here. A couple of salient quotes from that article:

"Weiner asked some simple, direct questions that no politician, much less Obama or HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, has managed to pose:

'What is an insurance company? They don't do a single check-up. They don't do a single exam, they don't perform an operation. Medicare has a 4 percent overhead rate. The real question is why do we have a private plan?'

"'It sounds like you're saying you think there is no need for us to have private insurance in health care,' Joe asked at one point.

"Weiner replied: 'I've asked you three times. What is their value? What are they bringing to the deal?'"

Later, Joe "even repeated Weiner's points clearly: The government would take over only the 'paying mechanism' of health care, not the doctors or their medical decisions themselves. His ears perked up every time Weiner mentioned that the nonprofit Medicare spends 4 percent on overhead, while private insurers spend 30 percent."

I wrote a column, available here, where I reported on the rising costs of health care in Douglas County -- and the likelihood that they will cost jobs in both the public and the private sectors. Because I knew this was timely, I had my tech staff turn on "comments" on our Drupal-based website. It quickly became apparent that mostly people were far more interested in attacking me, my sources, and any kind of federal government involvement, than they were in considering the underlying system.

One interesting comment was that one of the numbers I'd never seen disputed before -- the fact that our live birth rate is among the lowest in the developed world -- is now claimed to be because of our heroic efforts to rescue prematurely born infants, when the other countries don't. I find that one unlikely, but will keep an open mind till I can track down the actual incidence of premature births, and how many of them die. Could that number possibly be high enough to affect our international rankings? (See comment number 6 for the explanation!)

One of the comments to my column repeated the notion that health care costs are due to malpractice claims, which I've seen soundly refuted a number of times.

I'll be honest: health care reform isn't an emotional issue for me. There are a lot of nations out there who have tried a lot of different systems. When I last looked into this, it seemed pretty clear that the U.S. pays a larger percentage than other developed nations of our Gross Domestic Product on health care, has a larger percentage of people without any health coverage at all, has a higher infant mortality rate (subject to my investigation of this new counter-claim), and despite Sarah Palin's concern about death panels snuffing grandma, our life expectancy is actually shorter here than in, for instance, England, France, or Sweden -- all of whom do have national health care. Clearly, our current system isn't the best around, and I can't imagine why we wouldn't want to make it better.

Most recently, one reader of my column was so upset he wrote my bosses and urged my immediate termination for my "inappropriate political comments," and my "egregious and despicable breach of the public trust."

Clearly, this is a profoundly emotional issue for some. But when people talk about their medical "freedoms," which freedom do they mean: the freedom to pay more and get less? Because that's the way it is.

Comments

Anonymous said…
obivously no person in this world can conpromise with it's health.... it has to emotinal issue...

Debera


Cash Online Get Easy cash at your door step
The Doug said…
What was your boss's response to the request that you be terminated? Other than, clearly, to not.
Jamie said…
Debera: for sure. But health, and a health care system seem like different things to me.

Martha: hi!

Doug: I have an extraordinary board president. A thoughtful and cautious man, he went back, read my column and its comments, and concluded that in fact I really hadn't voiced a political opinion at all. But he assured the person that the comment would be shared with the entire Board. Fair enough!
tpersephone said…
The rebuttal of the idea that our birth mortality rate is so high is due to our 'heroic efforts' is refuted by simply asking "WHY are there so many premature births here in this country?" -- (and it is higher than elsewhere in the world.)

The answer is: Lack of prenatal care. Usually caused by... wait for it... lack of insurance. The infant mortality rate is highest among African Americans...
Jamie said…
Denver Post, Nov. 4, 2009, p. 6A. Marian MacDorman of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was the lead author of a new report. Among the findings:
* premature births are the chief reason the U.S. ranks 30th in the world in infant mortality, with a rate more than twice as high as infant-mortality rates in Sweden, Japan, Finland, Norway and the Czech Republic.
* about 1 in 8 U.S. births is premature. These are much less common in Europe.
* Premature babies born before 37 weeks tend to be more fragile and have underdeveloped lungs.
*If U.S. infants were as mature as Sweden's are at birth, nearly 8,000 infant deaths could be avoided, and the U.S. infant-mortality rate would be about one-third lower than it is.

* Poor access to prenatal care, maternal obesity and smoking, too-early cesarean sections, and induced labor and fertility treatments are among the reasons for preterm births.

So a deeper look into these numbers hardly vindicates the U.S. health system.

Popular posts from this blog

Uncle Bobby's Wedding

Recently, a library patron challenged (urged a reconsideration of the ownership or placement of) a book called "Uncle Bobby's Wedding." Honestly, I hadn't even heard of it until that complaint. But I did read the book, and responded to the patron, who challenged the item through email and requested that I respond online (not via snail-mail) about her concerns. I suspect the book will get a lot of challenges in 2008-2009. So I offer my response, purging the patron's name, for other librarians. Uncle Bobby's wedding June 27, 2008 Dear Ms. Patron: Thank you for working with my assistant to allow me to fit your concerns about “Uncle Bobby's Wedding,” by Sarah S. Brannen, into our “reconsideration” process. I have been assured that you have received and viewed our relevant policies: the Library Bill of Rights, the Freedom to Read, Free Access to Libraries for Minors, the Freedom to View, and our Reconsideration Policy. The intent of providing all tha

Installing Linux on a 2011 Macbook Pro

I had two MacBook Pros, both 13" models from late 2011. One had 4 gigs of RAM, and the other 8. Both of them were intolerably slow. In the first case, I wound up installing CleanMyMac , which did arcane things to various files, and put up alerts to warn me about disappearing memory. But it made the machine useable again, albeit not exactly speedy. I changed some habits: Safari as browser rather than Firefox or Chrome. I tried to keep tabs down to four or five. The second Mac had bigger problems. Its charger was shot, but even with that replaced, the battery tapped out at 75%. More importantly, the whole disk had been wiped, which meant that it wouldn't boot. Recently, I had downloaded a couple of Linux distributions ("distros") on USB drives. Elementary OS 5.1 (Hera) was reputed to be a lightweight, beautiful distro that shared some aesthetics with the Mac OS. So I thought I'd give it a try. Ahead of time, I tried to read up on how difficult it might be to

The enemies of literature

Every year, apologists for the restriction of reading stumble over themselves to "mock" Banned Books Week. Walther (Oct 1, 2023's " The Enemies of Literature ") upholds the grand tradition. Complaints about banning, the argument goes, are simply false. Walther writes, "In zero cases since the advent of Banned Books Week has a local or state ordinance been passed in this country that forbids the sale or general possession of any of the books in question." Yet Texas HB 900 was passed on June 13 of this year. It requires book vendors to assign ratings to books based only on the presence of depictions or references to sex. If a book is "sexually explicit" and has no direct connection to required curriculum, it must be pulled from the school. (One wonders what happens to the Bible, and its story of Lot's daughters, first offered by their father for gang rape, and whom he later sleeps with.) In Arkansas, legislation stated that school and pu