Skip to main content

Google and privacy

I use an Android phone and an Android tablet. There are a fair number of updates through the week to various apps. I appreciate that Google Play store tells me what's changed when I choose an update.

I was surprised to see that Google Maps wanted access to my "personal information." "New: Read your contacts. Allows the app to read data about your contacts stored on your phone, including the frequency with which you've called, emailed, or communicated in other ways with specific individuals. This permission allows apps to save your contact data, and malicious apps may share contact data without your knowledge." A map application wants to know how often I phone or email somebody? Why? So it can preload their addresses as maps for my convenience? Really?

Now this new change has spread to Twitter, Dropbox, and Hangouts. It's all in the name, I'm sure, of Big Data. Gee, who are the people at the Internet nexuses?

So I've been skipping these updates, because this change doesn't seem to have any other purpose than to spy on me and my friends.

"When the service is free, YOU are the product."

Then I got a letter from Google and GfK (a marketing firm) offering to pay me in exchange for putting in a high speed router to monitor my web traffic. They claim, of course, that "all of the information gathered from your household is strictly confidential in accordance ith GfK's policy (details available at www.screenwisepanel.com)." And the more devices I attach to this router, which they will install in my home, the more money they'll pay me. I suppose it's refreshing that a company both tells me they're spying on me, and pays me for the privilege. Now, mostly, they don't do either.


Comments

RDBangs6849 said…
I try to NOT do anything that gives an app access to my contacts. I say TRY, because I'm certain they have already figured out ways to mine my data.
Rich Bangs
Jamie said…
Yeah, what is UP with that? And sometimes, the updates don't warn you, or I don't notice that I've been warned.
Michael Sauers said…
I'm going to focus my comment on what you (possibly) get out of an app having access to your contacts. I am in no way commenting on whether this is a good thing or on how well (or not) they notify you.

For example: an app can't let you know if people you know are in your vicinity if the app doesn't know you want to know about. The app discovers this via your contact list.

Imagine Maps telling you that the person you have an upcoming meeting with is going to be 10 minutes away based on where they are and current traffic.

To set this up it looks through your contacts and says something like "I see your wife also uses maps. Would you like to be notified if..."

Granted (what I wasn't going to get in to,) the app should notify and have a minimal level of control over how that information is used, but that's just one reason why an app would need access to your contacts.
jeremy said…
With such big data companies, it will be interesting to say the least to see what's coming down the pike and if the majority of consumers will blithely take it in stride.
Jamie said…
Ok, Michael, I can understand a map wanting to know my location and addresses, but why FREQUENCY OF CONTACT?
Michael Sauers said…
Theoretically: The more frequently you contact someone, the more important they are to you.
Jamie said…
But their importance shouldn't affect the function of the application. It would seem to be of significance only to blackmailers or kidnappers.

Popular posts from this blog

Uncle Bobby's Wedding

Recently, a library patron challenged (urged a reconsideration of the ownership or placement of) a book called "Uncle Bobby's Wedding." Honestly, I hadn't even heard of it until that complaint. But I did read the book, and responded to the patron, who challenged the item through email and requested that I respond online (not via snail-mail) about her concerns. I suspect the book will get a lot of challenges in 2008-2009. So I offer my response, purging the patron's name, for other librarians. Uncle Bobby's wedding June 27, 2008 Dear Ms. Patron: Thank you for working with my assistant to allow me to fit your concerns about “Uncle Bobby's Wedding,” by Sarah S. Brannen, into our “reconsideration” process. I have been assured that you have received and viewed our relevant policies: the Library Bill of Rights, the Freedom to Read, Free Access to Libraries for Minors, the Freedom to View, and our Reconsideration Policy. The intent of providing all tha

Installing Linux on a 2011 Macbook Pro

I had two MacBook Pros, both 13" models from late 2011. One had 4 gigs of RAM, and the other 8. Both of them were intolerably slow. In the first case, I wound up installing CleanMyMac , which did arcane things to various files, and put up alerts to warn me about disappearing memory. But it made the machine useable again, albeit not exactly speedy. I changed some habits: Safari as browser rather than Firefox or Chrome. I tried to keep tabs down to four or five. The second Mac had bigger problems. Its charger was shot, but even with that replaced, the battery tapped out at 75%. More importantly, the whole disk had been wiped, which meant that it wouldn't boot. Recently, I had downloaded a couple of Linux distributions ("distros") on USB drives. Elementary OS 5.1 (Hera) was reputed to be a lightweight, beautiful distro that shared some aesthetics with the Mac OS. So I thought I'd give it a try. Ahead of time, I tried to read up on how difficult it might be to

The enemies of literature

Every year, apologists for the restriction of reading stumble over themselves to "mock" Banned Books Week. Walther (Oct 1, 2023's " The Enemies of Literature ") upholds the grand tradition. Complaints about banning, the argument goes, are simply false. Walther writes, "In zero cases since the advent of Banned Books Week has a local or state ordinance been passed in this country that forbids the sale or general possession of any of the books in question." Yet Texas HB 900 was passed on June 13 of this year. It requires book vendors to assign ratings to books based only on the presence of depictions or references to sex. If a book is "sexually explicit" and has no direct connection to required curriculum, it must be pulled from the school. (One wonders what happens to the Bible, and its story of Lot's daughters, first offered by their father for gang rape, and whom he later sleeps with.) In Arkansas, legislation stated that school and pu