Skip to main content

Reclaiming a moral sanction for the public sector

When I was in high school, I grew enamored of the works of Ayn Rand. One sentence stayed with me: what the capitalists of the world lacked was "a moral sanction." She meant a philosophy which explicitly endorsed a mode of being, a coherent set of principles. She provided one.

John Galt's long radio address laid out the Objectivist philosophy. It was written at a time when, in Rand's view, America was turning its back on its capitalist successes and embracing collectivism, especially that of the Soviets, which she had experienced firsthand, to the sorrow of her and her family.

Atlas Shrugged was published in 1957. Thirty years later, things had turned around, as in Gordon Gekko's speech in Wall Street in which he said, "Greed is good." Since then, we have seen capitalist excesses--oil industries that cause environmental crises, for instance--that make it hard to grant a pass to all who toil for profit.

But more worrisome to me is the withdrawal of a moral sanction from the public sector. For a long time now, the "greed is good" folks have pushed a consistent message: government is evil, taxation is theft, civil servants are incompetent petty tyrants. I know this to be false, a big lie that slanders important work.

My own belief is that neither profit nor non-profit organizations can be trusted. They are human enterprises, meaning that they are run by people. Some people are ethical. Some are corrupt. And we can be talking about the same people.

The consequence of "greed is good" is all around us. Right now, many people in America equate money with virtue, as in the prosperity gospel. A society in which there are grave inequalities of wealth and quality of life is one result.

The withdrawal of a moral sanction from those whose motives are not money also has consequences: civic disinterest, crumbling infrastructure, wholly avoidable poverty and suffering.

So one of the things I think about, a lot, is how to rebalance the scales, call out the solid value of thoughtful non-profit endeavors. Libraries are a sterling example, but they are not the only one. I think that message is important as the generations turn. It's one of the things I want to talk and write more about.

Comments

PLG member said…
I agree with you. Southern Poverty Law Center non-profit we have trusted and donated to many years demonstrating corruption.
As a long time worker on electoral politics at the local level just learned a man in my state whose race for governor I supported with much time has been indicted for taking kick backs on development..."Tallahassee Commissioner XXX and his longtime associate,XXX agreed to plead guilty to three charges — wire fraud, mail fraud and conspiracy to commit tax fraud. They were originally charged with more than 40 counts each as part of an FBI investigation into corruption at City Hall." Just two examples of so many in my life where people disappoint.
Moral Sanctions--A worthwhile topic to ponder,
Jamie LaRue said…
I'm sorry to hear it. But your examples are not-profit and government only. I don't deny that they happen. But I think we need to stop overlooking the often even more extreme and consequential betrayals of trust and ethics that happen in the business world. Take banking, for instance, Wells Fargo, whose employees were encouraged to create well over 1.4 million fake accounts without customer consent. Who was held accountable for that? And what does that say about corporate culture?

Popular posts from this blog

Uncle Bobby's Wedding

Recently, a library patron challenged (urged a reconsideration of the ownership or placement of) a book called "Uncle Bobby's Wedding." Honestly, I hadn't even heard of it until that complaint. But I did read the book, and responded to the patron, who challenged the item through email and requested that I respond online (not via snail-mail) about her concerns. I suspect the book will get a lot of challenges in 2008-2009. So I offer my response, purging the patron's name, for other librarians. Uncle Bobby's wedding June 27, 2008 Dear Ms. Patron: Thank you for working with my assistant to allow me to fit your concerns about “Uncle Bobby's Wedding,” by Sarah S. Brannen, into our “reconsideration” process. I have been assured that you have received and viewed our relevant policies: the Library Bill of Rights, the Freedom to Read, Free Access to Libraries for Minors, the Freedom to View, and our Reconsideration Policy. The intent of providing all tha

Installing Linux on a 2011 Macbook Pro

I had two MacBook Pros, both 13" models from late 2011. One had 4 gigs of RAM, and the other 8. Both of them were intolerably slow. In the first case, I wound up installing CleanMyMac , which did arcane things to various files, and put up alerts to warn me about disappearing memory. But it made the machine useable again, albeit not exactly speedy. I changed some habits: Safari as browser rather than Firefox or Chrome. I tried to keep tabs down to four or five. The second Mac had bigger problems. Its charger was shot, but even with that replaced, the battery tapped out at 75%. More importantly, the whole disk had been wiped, which meant that it wouldn't boot. Recently, I had downloaded a couple of Linux distributions ("distros") on USB drives. Elementary OS 5.1 (Hera) was reputed to be a lightweight, beautiful distro that shared some aesthetics with the Mac OS. So I thought I'd give it a try. Ahead of time, I tried to read up on how difficult it might be to

The enemies of literature

Every year, apologists for the restriction of reading stumble over themselves to "mock" Banned Books Week. Walther (Oct 1, 2023's " The Enemies of Literature ") upholds the grand tradition. Complaints about banning, the argument goes, are simply false. Walther writes, "In zero cases since the advent of Banned Books Week has a local or state ordinance been passed in this country that forbids the sale or general possession of any of the books in question." Yet Texas HB 900 was passed on June 13 of this year. It requires book vendors to assign ratings to books based only on the presence of depictions or references to sex. If a book is "sexually explicit" and has no direct connection to required curriculum, it must be pulled from the school. (One wonders what happens to the Bible, and its story of Lot's daughters, first offered by their father for gang rape, and whom he later sleeps with.) In Arkansas, legislation stated that school and pu