Skip to main content

Intellectual Freedom and Social Justice

After giving a couple of talks on this topic, I was invited to submit an article to the Texas Library Journal, which comes out today. I'm reposting it here. 

Embedding professional values takes time, and grows from social context

Professions are predicated on values. In 1892, the American Library Association (ALA) was guided by this modest motto: "The best books for the most people at the least cost." 

In 1938, Des Moines Public Library director, Forrest Spaulding, noted that, "Today indications in many parts of the world point to growing intolerance, suppression of free speech and censorship affecting the rights of minorities and individuals." Among those indications was the rise of Hitler in Germany, Mussolini in Italy, and Stalin in the Soviet Union. Books under attack in Des Moines eventually included Mein Kampf (anti-Semitic) and Grapes of Wrath (communist). In response, Spaulding pitched a "Library's Bill of Rights" to his board. In 1939, it was revised and adopted by the council of the American Library Association. Since then, it has been adopted by many libraries.

That marked the true beginning of intellectual freedom as a core value of librarianship. It also may have reflected a dawning social justice awareness: People had the right, and perhaps the obligation, to investigate what was going on in the world, the better to prevent human tragedy and oppression.

Social Justice or Social Responsibility (an outgrowth of the civil rights movement and student activism), also has a long history in librarianship. But the core tenets of Social Justice as a rising value in librarianship seem to trace their origin to Critical Race Theory (CRT). In the mid-1970s, CRT was proposed by African American legal scholars. They argued that the history of race relations in the United States, poisoned by the enslavement of Africans, was so pernicious and systemic that it constituted a special case; First Amendment protections should not apply to racist speech. Eventually, this area of writing and research generated many of the terms we now use to discuss Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI): white privilege, unconscious bias, microaggressions, and systemic racism in many institutions, pointedly including the law. Critical Race Theory also included the need to transform society through principled resistance, through calling out racist or bigoted behavior, and through being better allies to marginalized people. 

And just as intellectual freedom had the social context of World War II, followed by McCarthyism, followed by student protests against an unpopular war, social justice has a context as well. In the 21st century alone it ranged from anti-Milo Yiannopoulos protests at Berkeley to the Black Lives Matter protests following a series of high profile murders of Black men, women, and teenagers by police.

Social justice, like intellectual freedom, now has official library committees that embrace the cause, boasts many professional speeches and writings, has established its own office (of Diversity, Literacy, and Outreach Services), and shares emerging best practices.

Is there room for two values in librarianship? Yes.

We can share values, and have different priorities

Many intellectual freedom aficionadoes also value social justice. Many avowed social justice advocates are fiercely opposed to censorship. But even when we share those values, we may not prioritize them the same way.

That can be driven by personal experience (being a Black or Queer librarian, for example), by social context (what is happening as one comes of age), or community politics (municipal or county power struggles, or race relations, for instance).

But while there is certainly tension at times between the two values, I do not believe that they are really, at base, opposed. The purpose of free speech is greater individual and social freedom, and something we talk too little about these days: The Common Good. Before groups can advocate for a more just society, they must have the ability to meet, to speak, and to plumb both past and emerging literature. Indeed, that gathering and speaking is part of the advocacy. Others, of course, will advocate for their views, too.

In libraries, Intellectual Freedom serves Social Justice

I reject the idea that the First Amendment is a tool of oppression in libraries. One need only review ALA's Office for Intellectual Freedom's annual "most challenged" list to see the stark truth: Overwhelmingly, challenges against American libraries tend to concentrate on works by or about traditionally marginalized populations.

Libraries that have adopted the Library Bill of Rights, that have a Collection Policy and a Request for Reconsideration process, that reach out for support from the Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF), are better positioned to resist those challenges. In libraries, our policies and practices do not use the idea of intellectual freedom to suppress social justice--rather, to defend it. This has been the case since the OIF's founding.

How we talk to each other matters

When I became a librarian, the defense of intellectual freedom was suffused with righteous anger and indignation. Intellectual freedom heroes got awards. Librarians who backed down--when we knew about it (and usually we didn't)--could expect harsh criticism from other librarians.

Then I became a library director. My library wound up dealing with 250 challenges over the space of 24 years. In the process, I realized that a pugnacious free speech warrior stance, in my very conservative county, would be institutional suicide. I learned that you don't change people's minds by yelling at them. But you do lose their support. Moreover, after a lot of careful thought, I realized that times had changed. My library’s challenges weren't always, weren't even usually, ideological. They were emotional, clustering around materials and services for children between the ages of 4-6, and 14-16.

By then I was a parent, too. Those ages are key transitions in the life of your offspring: from toddlerhood to childhood, and from childhood to adulthood. The unifying concern was love and loss and grief. Parents stepped in defensively to "protect the innocence" of children they had trouble letting go of.

That realization of the emotional context of challenges profoundly changed the way I talked and thought about censorship. I could listen more deeply and compassionately to the parents, focusing more on reassurance than contradiction. Children do, mostly, absorb their parents' values. And it doesn't take much reflection to see that it's safer to prepare yourself for conflict by reading about it in the safety of the library, than encountering it for the first time on the streets.

Many new library directors, deeply passionate about social justice issues, wind up in rural public libraries, most of which trend red. Those communities don't like being yelled at or lectured to, either. Can we learn to talk about the issues with our communities, and with each other, in ways that promote understanding rather than performative confrontation?

We must diversify our collections and staff

The conversation among librarians will probably continue with some tension, and that’s ok. But maintaining professional courtesy and personal goodwill, as important as they are, are not as key as the two areas libraries must address in the next decade. Neither problem is new. Both problems have proven thus far intractable to our best efforts.

The first is the diversity of our collections. The Big Four publishers have many of the same problems as libraries. They hire people like themselves (mostly white) and those people acquire books that appeal to themselves. Bottom line: our collections are not much more diverse than they were 20 years ago, although there is some modest progress at least in children’s publishing. I believe the only solution is to ramp up our purchases from self-published authors, and cultivate those authors locally. People who can't find books about people like themselves conclude that libraries aren't relevant to them. As our communities continue to diversify, that becomes an existential threat to ongoing support. But we should be telling the whole human story anyhow.

The second is the diversity of our staff. Again, the less we look like our communities, the less likely it is that we matter to them. We need to appeal sooner and younger to people of color. It's just easier to recruit somebody early, then help them get a degree, than to wait for them to run the gauntlet of library school and come looking for us.

Our culture needs us

I often tell the story of the Darby (MT) Community Public Library, in which the library director managed a controversial "Muslim Journey" program with great thoughtfulness. Her efforts were rewarded with participants that spoke of their thirst for meaningful conversation, and their gratitude for finding it at the library.

I also have spoken with a number of young librarians, entering the profession as advocates for social justice, who offer programs, and in the process become more expert, more inclusive, and less strident. That was my experience with IF outreach, too.

Many Americans weary of endless culture wars, of perpetual outrage, and of a world view that focuses only on being right, instead of being kind, friendly, or curious.

Our culture, whether local, regional, or national, needs us. And we librarians need each other.


Comments

Anonymous said…
The First Amendment can be a tool of oppression if an institution has internalized inequity via policy that actively empowers one or more groups over another. Most (maybe all) libraries have built-in value equalizers, which give ideas a chance to stand on their own without help or hindrance. Privilege and bias can creep in through procedure or the individual giving service, but overarching values, which apply to all groups, will win the day for better (meaning more universally desirable and useful) ideas and information. The library as an equal platform, and not a suppressor of specific ideas, makes it equitable.

Rural librarians must show professionalism and tact when introducing information to their communities. Making incendiary public decrees and fanning controversy often causes people to lean into their biases as they feel desperate to defend them, regardless of truth or validity. Instead, a subtle and more time-tested approach is required. We infiltrate, making the library staff a part of the community. We diversify and bolster the collection, organically allowing users to find or request new ideas as they grow. We partner and support and gently redirect where we can, saying, "Come with me on this journey," or "Here's a different perspective." We find activities that serve local interests, while also working in information to expand viewpoints. We give them an institution to embrace, rather than one to fight. Using the institution to beat people over the head with the ideas that we like is a dangerous path to tread. It's the opposite of equity and inclusion.
PLG member said…
Thank you for addressing these issues.
Jane Martel said…
Nicely said, Jamie, as always.
Jamie LaRue said…
Thanks to you all. I remember one of my former editors, Mary Jo Godwin, said that "a good library has something in it to offend everybody." But I always thought it was more accurate, and a better public stand, to say that we have something to support everyone in our community. I bought "Daddy's Roommate" because a woman in our community was trying to talk with her son about her husband leaving her for another man. She ASKED for the book, and it was our job to try to help her, drawing from fairly mainstream publishing companies.

But is it our job to "support" overtly white supremacist groups like the Proud Boys by buying, for instance, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion? I still think the law is clear that people have the right to meet and discuss all kinds of topics. And sometimes people are STUDYING such things as anti-Semitism and want to consult source materials. But it certainly makes ME uncomfortable to add such content. Maybe it's also true that a good library has something in it that will offend the director?

I've been reviewing some of the work of Martin Carcasson of Colorado State University. He talks about something called Polarity Management. In one of his elegant diagrams (see this video: https://youtu.be/_Cm6qlzLstI) he puts up a CONTINUUM with Liberty on one side and Security on the other. In the middle is a balance between the two; on either side is one value prioritized over the other. But very rarely (except for on Fox News) do people really believe in Freedom and REJECT Security, or vice versa. Most of us are NOT extremists, and do fall on the continuum between them. The good news: it should allow us to talk to each other.
Jen Maley said…
Kudos on a well-written piece. I especially like this paragraph: "The second is the diversity of our staff. Again, the less we look like our communities, the less likely it is that we matter to them. We need to appeal sooner and younger to people of color. It's just easier to recruit somebody early, then help them get a degree, than to wait for them to run the gauntlet of library school and come looking for us." As a school librarian, I've found that hiring young people as an assistant helps instill the passion in what we do as librarians. Get them hooked first, and then get them the necessary credentials.

Jamie said…
Jen, yes, once they get a taste of the combined intellectual issues, the rewards of genuine service, and the atmosphere of a values-based public institution, we've got them!
Anonymous said…
Thank you for this very informative blog post. Until I read it, I had no idea that proponents of Critical Race Theory believed that the First Amendment should be conditional, based on the content of speech. That is a contradiction in terms of the first order.
Mark Hudson said…
Interesting article that makes some good and valid points, but it seems odd that the essay's account of the "long history in librarianship" of "Social Justice or Social Responsibility" doesn't once mention the Social Responsibilities Round Table (SRRT) and suggests that social justice "only now" (i.e., recently) "has official library committees that embrace the cause, boasts many professional speeches and writings, has established its own office (of Diversity, Literacy, and Outreach Services), and shares emerging best practices." Perhaps the author is simply unaware of the existence of SRRT since 1969?
Jamie LaRue said…
Mark, the article is admittedly short on historic precedent, but I did equate Social Justice with Social Responsibility -- I could make the Roundtable more explicit (I had to edit a lot to hit a word lenth limit, but could expand here). But I stand by the connection to CRT as the source for the RISING value. Thanks for the comment.
Unknown said…
I am a manger of a small library in rural central NC. Our Youth Services team (1.5 FTE) are so excited have had their proposal selected for ALA 2021, "Brave Conversations: Kids’ Club for Social Justice". We've taken some heat from the community for starting this virtual program for kids K-5, but we've also received amazing support from folks as well.
PLG member said…
The work of the Progressive Librarians Guild should not be overlooked in pre-CRT rising: http://www.progressivelibrariansguild.org/
The open source journal, Progressive Librarian: (1991-) http://www.progressivelibrariansguild.org/PL_Jnl/jnl_contents.shtml
I commend esp. "Librarianship and Resistance" 1998/1999
by Sandy Iverson;
Activist Librarianship: Heritage or Heresy?
by Ann Sparanese 2003;
PLG - ¡Presente! Report from the United States Social Forum (2007/2008).
LIS students and the annual Braverman Award: http://www.progressivelibrariansguild.org/content/braverman_list.shtml


--Kathleen (member PLG, ALA, REFORMA)
School of Information, University of South Florida

Popular posts from this blog

Uncle Bobby's Wedding

Recently, a library patron challenged (urged a reconsideration of the ownership or placement of) a book called "Uncle Bobby's Wedding." Honestly, I hadn't even heard of it until that complaint. But I did read the book, and responded to the patron, who challenged the item through email and requested that I respond online (not via snail-mail) about her concerns. I suspect the book will get a lot of challenges in 2008-2009. So I offer my response, purging the patron's name, for other librarians. Uncle Bobby's wedding June 27, 2008 Dear Ms. Patron: Thank you for working with my assistant to allow me to fit your concerns about “Uncle Bobby's Wedding,” by Sarah S. Brannen, into our “reconsideration” process. I have been assured that you have received and viewed our relevant policies: the Library Bill of Rights, the Freedom to Read, Free Access to Libraries for Minors, the Freedom to View, and our Reconsideration Policy. The intent of providing all tha

Installing Linux on a 2011 Macbook Pro

I had two MacBook Pros, both 13" models from late 2011. One had 4 gigs of RAM, and the other 8. Both of them were intolerably slow. In the first case, I wound up installing CleanMyMac , which did arcane things to various files, and put up alerts to warn me about disappearing memory. But it made the machine useable again, albeit not exactly speedy. I changed some habits: Safari as browser rather than Firefox or Chrome. I tried to keep tabs down to four or five. The second Mac had bigger problems. Its charger was shot, but even with that replaced, the battery tapped out at 75%. More importantly, the whole disk had been wiped, which meant that it wouldn't boot. Recently, I had downloaded a couple of Linux distributions ("distros") on USB drives. Elementary OS 5.1 (Hera) was reputed to be a lightweight, beautiful distro that shared some aesthetics with the Mac OS. So I thought I'd give it a try. Ahead of time, I tried to read up on how difficult it might be to

The enemies of literature

Every year, apologists for the restriction of reading stumble over themselves to "mock" Banned Books Week. Walther (Oct 1, 2023's " The Enemies of Literature ") upholds the grand tradition. Complaints about banning, the argument goes, are simply false. Walther writes, "In zero cases since the advent of Banned Books Week has a local or state ordinance been passed in this country that forbids the sale or general possession of any of the books in question." Yet Texas HB 900 was passed on June 13 of this year. It requires book vendors to assign ratings to books based only on the presence of depictions or references to sex. If a book is "sexually explicit" and has no direct connection to required curriculum, it must be pulled from the school. (One wonders what happens to the Bible, and its story of Lot's daughters, first offered by their father for gang rape, and whom he later sleeps with.) In Arkansas, legislation stated that school and pu